The Chinese and Japanese Identity

Referat
7/10 (1 vot)
Domeniu: Engleză
Conține 1 fișier: doc
Pagini : 17 în total
Cuvinte : 6416
Mărime: 35.52KB (arhivat)
Publicat de: Ivan Gheorghiță
Puncte necesare: 6
Profesor îndrumător / Prezentat Profesorului: Boldea Monica
Referat sustinut la FEAA Timisoara.

Extras din referat

1. The identity in the vision of Geert Hofstede

The world "identity", a terminology first used in the global Cultural Study Wave, refers to the perspective from which cultural characteristics of an ethnic group or a special community is analyzed.

Between China and Japan, Hofstede find a lot of identities which reffer to power distance, individualism, masculinity, uncertainty avoidance, long-term orientation.

Power Distance Index (PDI) is the extent to which the less powerful members of organizations and institutions (like the family) accept and expect that power is distributed unequally. This represents inequality (more versus less), but defined from below, not from above. It suggests that a society's level of inequality is endorsed by the followers as much as by the leaders. Power and inequality, of course, are extremely fundamental facts of any society and anybody with some international experience will be aware that 'all societies are unequal, but some are more unequal than others'.

Individualism (IDV) on the one side versus its opposite, collectivism, that is the degree to which individuals are inte-grated into groups. On the individualist side we find societies in which the ties between individuals are loose: everyone is expected to look after him/herself and his/her immediate family. On the collectivist side, we find societies in which people from birth onwards are integrated into strong, cohesive in-groups, often extended families (with uncles, aunts and grandparents) which continue protecting them in exchange for unquestioning loyalty. The word 'collectivism' in this sense has no political meaning: it refers to the group, not to the state. Again, the issue addressed by this dimension is an extremely fundamental one, regarding all societies in the world.

Masculinity (MAS) versus its opposite, femininity, refers to the distribution of roles between the genders which is another fundamental issue for any society to which a range of solutions are found. The IBM studies revealed that (a) women's values differ less among societies than men's values; (b) men's values from one country to another contain a dimension from very assertive and competitive and maximally different from women's values on the one side, to modest and caring and similar to women's values on the other. The assertive pole has been called 'masculine' and the modest, caring pole 'feminine'. The women in feminine countries have the same modest, caring values as the men; in the masculine countries they are somewhat assertive and competitive, but not as much as the men, so that these countries show a gap between men's values and women's values.

Uncertainty Avoidance Index (UAI) deals with a society's tolerance for uncertainty and ambiguity; it ultimately refers to man's search for Truth. It indicates to what extent a culture programs its members to feel either uncomfortable or comfortable in unstructured situations. Unstructured situations are novel, unknown, surprising, different from usual. Uncertainty avoiding cultures try to minimize the possibility of such situations by strict laws and rules, safety and security measures, and on the philosophical and religious level by a belief in absolute Truth; 'there can only be one Truth and we have it'. People in uncertainty avoiding countries are also more emotional, and motivated by inner nervous energy. The opposite type, uncertainty accepting cultures, are more tolerant of opinions different from what they are used to; they try to have as few rules as possible, and on the philosophical and religious level they are relativist and allow many currents to flow side by side. People within these cultures are more phlegmatic and contemplative, and not expected by their environment to express emotions.

Long-Term Orientation (LTO) versus short-term orientation: this fifth dimension was found in a study among students in 23 countries around the world, using a questionnaire designed by Chinese scholars It can be said to deal with Virtue regardless of Truth. Values associated with Long Term Orientation are thrift and perseverance; values associated with Short Term Orientation are respect for tradition, fulfilling social obligations, and protecting one's 'face'. Both the positively and the negatively rated values of this dimension are found in the teachings of Confucius, the most influential Chinese philosopher who lived around 500 B.C.; however, the dimension also applies to countries without a Confucian heritage.

China and Japan are collectivism and individualism country, masculine and feminine country, low power distance Compare with China who has a low avoidance, Japan has both, high and low power distance.

Geert Hofstede analysis for China has Long-term Orientation (LTO) the highest-ranking factor (118), which is true for all Asian cultures. This Dimension indicates a society's time perspective and an attitude of persevering; that is, overcoming obstacles with time, if not with will and strength. (see Asian countries graph below).

The Chinese rank lower than any other Asian country in the Individualism (IDV) ranking, at 20 compared to an average of 24. This may be attributed, in part, to the high level of emphasis on a Collectivist society by the Communist rule, as compared to one of Individualism.

The low Individualism ranking is manifest in a close and committed member 'group', be that a family, extended family, or extended relationships. Loyalty in a collectivist culture is paramount. The society fosters strong relationships where everyone takes responsibility for fellow members of their group.

Of note is China's significantly higher Power Distance ranking of 80 compared to the other Far East Asian countries' average of 60, and the world average of 55. This is indicative of a high level of inequality of power and wealth within the society. This condition is not necessarily forced upon the population, but rather accepted by the society as their cultural heritage.

Preview document

The Chinese and Japanese Identity - Pagina 1
The Chinese and Japanese Identity - Pagina 2
The Chinese and Japanese Identity - Pagina 3
The Chinese and Japanese Identity - Pagina 4
The Chinese and Japanese Identity - Pagina 5
The Chinese and Japanese Identity - Pagina 6
The Chinese and Japanese Identity - Pagina 7
The Chinese and Japanese Identity - Pagina 8
The Chinese and Japanese Identity - Pagina 9
The Chinese and Japanese Identity - Pagina 10
The Chinese and Japanese Identity - Pagina 11
The Chinese and Japanese Identity - Pagina 12
The Chinese and Japanese Identity - Pagina 13
The Chinese and Japanese Identity - Pagina 14

Conținut arhivă zip

  • The Chinese and Japanese Identity.doc

Te-ar putea interesa și

Paper în Interculturality - Gestures în a Cross Cultural Perspective - A Comparative Study of Asian and European Cultural Gestures

Introduction “If a man be gracious and courteous to strangers, it shows he is a citizen of the world, and that his heart is no island cut off from...

Ai nevoie de altceva?