Cuprins
- 1. Introduction: What is Central Banking?
- 2. Central Banking in the United States
- 3. The First Bank of the United States (1791-1811)
- 4. Second Bank of the United States (1816-1836)
- 5. States in Charge
- 6. Money and the Constitution
- 7. Michigan Act (1837)
- 8. Depository Safety and Economic Safety
- 9. State and Private Attempts at Reform
- 10. National Banking Acts of 1863 and 1864
- 11. Two Remaining Major Defects
- 12. Aldrich Plan (1910)
- 13. Federal Reserve Act (1913)
Extras din referat
1. At its most fundamental level, a central bank is simply a bank which other banks have in common. Small rural banks might each have deposit accounts at a larger urban bank to facilitate their transactions in the city. By these criteria, a financial system might have several central banks. More prosaically, a central bank is usually a government sanctioned bank that has specific duties related to the performance of the macro economy. Typically, an "official" central bank is charged by a central government to control the money supply for the purpose of promoting economic stability. It may have other duties as well, such as some degree of regulatory power over the financial system, operating a check-clearing system, or to perform general banking services for the central government. Most industrialized economies have a central bank. The Bank of England, the Bank of Japan, the German Bundesbank, and the United States Federal Reserve are all central banks. While their organizational structures and powers vary, each bank is responsible for controlling its nation's money supply.
2. The history of central banking in the United States does not begin with the Federal Reserve. The Bank of the United States received its charter in 1791 from the U.S. Congress and was signed by President Washington. The Bank's charter was designed by Secretary of the Treasury Alexander Hamilton, modeling it after the Bank of England, the British central bank.
The Bank met with considerable controversy. Agrarian interests were opposed to the Bank on the grounds that they feared it would favor commercial and industrial interests over their own, and that it would promote the use of paper currency at the expense of gold and silver specie. Ownership of the Bank was also an issue. By the time the Bank's charter was up for renewal in 1811, about 70 percent of its stock was owned by foreigners. Although foreign stock had no voting power to influence the Bank's operations, outstanding shares carried an 8.4 percent dividend. Another twenty year charter, it was argued, would result in about $12 million in already scarce gold and silver being exported to the bank's foreign owners.
Secretary of State Thomas Jefferson believed the Bank was unconstitutional because it was an unauthorized extension of federal power. Congress, Jefferson argued, possessed only delegated powers which were specifically enumerated in the constitution. The only possible source of authority to charter the Bank, Jefferson believed, was in the necessary and proper clause (Art. I, Sec. 8, Cl. 18). However, he cautioned that if the clause could be interpreted so broadly in this case, then there was no real limit to what Congress could do. Then, curiously, in the memorandum in which he articulated his thoughts on this matter, Jefferson advised that if the President felt that the pros and cons of constitutionality seemed about equal, then out of respect to the Congress which passed the legislation the President could sign it. James Madison said the Bank was "condemned by the silence of the constitution".
Hamilton conceded that the constitution was silent on banking. He asserted, however, that Congress clearly had the power to tax, to borrow money, and to regulate interstate and foreign commerce. Would it be reasonable for Congress to charter a corporation to assist in carrying out these powers? He argued that the necessary and proper clause gave Congress the power to enact any law which was necessary to execute its powers. A "necessary" law in this context Hamilton did not take to mean one that was absolutely indispensable. Instead, he argued that it meant a law that was "needful, requisite, incidental, useful, or conducive to." Then Hamilton offered a proposed rule of discretion: "Does the proposed measure abridge a pre-existing right of any State or of any individual?” Hamilton's arguments carried the day and convinced President Washington.
The Bank of the United States had both public and private functions. Its most important public function was to control the money supply by regulating the amount of notes state banks could issue, and by transferring reserves to different parts of the country. It was also the depository of the Treasury's funds. This was an important function because, as later experience would prove, without a central bank, the Treasury's deposits were placed in private commercial banks on the basis of political favoritism. The Bank of the U.S. was also a privately owned, profit-seeking institution. It competed with state banks for deposits and loan customers. Because the Bank was both setting the rules and competing in the marketplace especially irritated state banks and they joined with agrarian interests and Jeffersonians in opposition to the Bank. The Bank was supervised by the Secretary of the Treasury who could inspect all the Bank's transactions and accounts, except those of private individuals, and order audits on demand. The Bank's ownership was set by $10 million in capital, divided into 25,000 shares of voting stock with a par value of $400 each. About 80 percent of the stock was sold to the public with the remainder capitalized by the federal government. No individual could own more than 30 shares. Shares were also sold to foreigners, although the Bank's charter did not grant them voting rights.
3. The First Bank of the United States is considered a success by economic historians. Treasury Secretary Albert Gallatian commented that the Bank was "wisely and skillfully managed". The Bank carried a remarkable amount of liquidity. In 1809, for example, its specie/banknote ratio was about 40 percent (compared to a modern average reserve/deposit ratio of about 12 percent) making it probably the most liquid bank in the U.S. at the time. Despite the liquidity, the Bank was also profitable, earning most of its income through substantial loans to both government and private business. It helped to end several bank runs by transferring funds to banks in need of temporary liquidity
Preview document
Conținut arhivă zip
- History of Central Banking in the United States.doc