Extras din proiect
1. Executive Summary
In a rapidly evolving world where knowledge is constantly increasing, companies need to adapt their business
model in order to maintain their clientele's satisfaction and be at a competitive advantage. Hewlett-Packard, an
organization operating worldwide, succeeds in doing so by placing the human capital at the center of their
knowledge management initiative, while focusing on social interaction for a better leveraging of their
knowledge. The current paper will use a specific three-leveled theoretical framework to demonstrate that by
means of social interaction an effective knowledge management is achieved. We will begin by investigating on
HP’s approach to knowledge conversion based on the two dimensions, explicit and implicit, using specific tools
such as the Knowledge-maps. Secondly, we will discuss how their newly implemented Learning Communities
constitute Communities of Practices that enable the transfer of know-how amongst the employees. Thirdly, we
will explore on the two strategies focus on personalization and codification, adopted by HP, whilst debating on
the dominant one. Lastly we will inspect the limitations of our work and our intended recommendation for HP.
2. Introduction
We have focused our investigation on HPC and how the internal communication affects their knowledge
transfer, while discussing how by means of social interaction they accomplish an effective knowledge
management. We will undertake different lenses to approach the knowledge transfer within an organization.
Furthermore, we will discuss the aim of learning communities and the effects they have upon the knowledge
management, and how they have been beneficial for the company’s successful knowledge management team.
Additionally, we use the personalization and codification concepts in order to illustrate the dominant view of
knowledge transferal. It is our belief that these different theories and concepts have been beneficial in
augmenting how the knowledge management has taken place.
3. Case description
As the second leading global provider of software, computing solutions and computer related services for
business and home, Hewlett-Packard (HP) has decided on supporting the growth of the company by means of
reconstructing their approach to knowledge management. The solution-consulting body within HP is Hewlett-
Packard Consulting (HPC), with more than 4000 employees assisting clients on software and hardware related
matters while ensuring that they receive the greatest return from products and services acquired from HP
(Parskey & Martiny, p. 3); by doing so, the company enables the integration and optimization of systems sold by
HP and other vendors, whereas achieving broad recognition in the industry for their excellence in knowledge
management. However, when clients were required to provide them with feedback, HP discovered that the
customers expected the consultants to use not only their personal experience, but rather the broader knowledge
within the organization. With regard to this business problem, HPC states that their “clients believe that the
value and depth of HPC knowledge is highly dependent on the consultants assigned to their project” (Parskey &
Martiny, p. 4), therefore their business need became to deliver “increasing new and innovative services in a
consistent, high quality manner regardless of the consultants assigned to the engagement” (Parskey & Martiny,
p. 4), thus their focus on leveraging knowledge from different projects and from different parts of the world. In
turn, the Knowledge Management (KM) team in collaboration with the HPC leadership decided to begin with a
Project pilot within the North America unit whose success eventually aided them in developing a three phased
model for the KM implementation across the world-wide organization.
Bibliografie
Alvesson, M., & Karreman, D. (2001). Odd couple: Making sense of the curious concept of knowledge
management. Journal of Management Studies, 38:7,995-1018.
Brown & Duguid (1999), as cited in Hildrum, J. M. (2009). Sharing Tacit Knowledge Online: A case study of elearning
in Cisco’s Network of system intergrator partner firms. Industry and Innovation, 16:2, 197-218
Coenen et al., (2004), as cited in Hildrum, J. M. (2009). Sharing Tacit Knowledge Online: A case study of elearning
in Cisco’s Network of system intergrator partner firms. Industry and Innovation, 16:2, 197-218
Cook & Yanow (1996), as cited in Tsoukas, H. (2002). Do we really understand tacit knowledge?. Handbook of
Organizational Learning and Knowledge, Blackwell, forthcoming
Cowan et al., (2000), as cited in Hansen, M. T., Nohria, N., Tierney, T. (1999). What’s your strategy in
managing knowledge?. Harvard Business Review, 106-116.
David & Foray (1995), as cited in Hansen, M. T., Nohria, N., Tierney, T. (1999). What’s your strategy in
managing knowledge?. Harvard Business Review, 106-116.
Gibson & Gibbs (2006), as cited in Hildrum, J. M. (2009). Sharing Tacit Knowledge Online: A case study of elearning
in Cisco’s Network of system intergrator partner firms. Industry and Innovation, 16:2, 197-218
Hansen, M. T., Nohria, N., Tierney, T. (1999). What’s your strategy in managing knowledge?. Harvard Business
Review, 106-116.
Hildrum, J. M. (2009). Sharing Tacit Knowledge Online: A case study of e-learning in Cisco’s Network of
system intergrator partner firms. Industry and Innovation, 16:2, 197-218
Lundvall (2001), as cited in Hildrum, J. M. (2009). Sharing Tacit Knowledge Online: A case study of e- learning
in Cisco’s Network of system intergrator partner firms. Industry and Innovation, 16:2, 197-218
McAfee (2006), as cited in Hildrum, J. M. (2009). Sharing Tacit Knowledge Online: A case study of e- learning
in Cisco’s Network of system intergrator partner firms. Industry and Innovation, 16:2, 197-218.
Nonaka, I. (1991). The Knowledge-Creating Company. Harvard Business Review
Nonaka & Takeuchi (1995), as cited in Tsoukas, H. (2002). Do we really understand tacit knowledge?.
Handbook of Organizational Learning and Knowledge, Blackwell, forthcoming
Parskey & Martiny. Hewlett Packard, Linkage Inc.’s Best Practices in Knowledge Management &
Organizational Learning
Polanyi, M. (1961), as cited in Hildrum, J. M. (2009). Sharing Tacit Knowledge Online: A case study of elearning
in Cisco’s Network of system intergrator partner firms. Industry and Innovation, 16:2, 197-218
Polanyi, M. (1966), as cited in Hildrum, J. M. (2009). Sharing Tacit Knowledge Online: A case study of elearning
in Cisco’s Network of system intergrator partner firms. Industry and Innovation, 16:2, 197-218
Tsoukas, H. (2002). Do we really understand tacit knowledge?. Handbook of Organizational Learning and
Knowledge, Blackwell, forthcoming
Tsoukas and Vladimirou (2001), as cited in Tsoukas, H. (2002). Do we really understand tacit knowledge?.
Handbook of Organizational Learning and Knowledge, Blackwell, forthcoming
Preview document
Conținut arhivă zip
- When Social meets Strategy.pdf